Don’t allow the EU, whether it’s Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber or Guy Verhofstadt, to define the “European way of life”.

Don’t allow the EU, whether it’s Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber or Guy Verhofstadt, to define the “European way of life”.

Don’t allow the EU, whether it’s Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber or Guy Verhofstadt, to define the “European way of life”.

Any EU enthusiast or multicult zealot will inevitably degrade and pervert a wonderful term. Eurocrats ruin everything they touch.

Of course, Verhofstadt says it’s racist, while von der Leyen believes it represents “EU values”. Both are truly warped in their thoughts; however, the most absurd and pathetic attempt to define the “European way of life” was uttered by EPP leader Manfred Weber:

Weber said his understanding of the concept was “rescuing people in the Mediterranean, not closing harbours to migrants, and fighting for freedom in Hong Kong.”

Weber added, “These things, for me, are what is meant by the European way of life.”

Good grief, this is the leader of the EPP.

The V4 Report has used this term for years but we had something far different in mind.

When one actually reads the description of this new EU position created by von der Leyen for a ‘civil servant’ from Greece, they will find that it does not talk of stopping migration, but instead puts a heavy emphasis on ways to integrate the illegals.

Of course, this has failed everywhere in the EU…France, Britain, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, etc.

One cannot integrate a group of migrants storming Europe from alien cultures who have no intention of assimilating, but instead only seek to dominate.

There is a history of complete failure on this issue inside the West EU bloc…or are we to pretend that the multicult theology is working wonderfully in Paris and London? 😬

https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/news/epp-leader-defends-controversial-‘european-way-life’-portfolio